A recent ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit illustrates the challenges faced by developers of contaminated properties and their lenders, as well as the extraordinary risks associated with sites impacted by dry cleaning solvents and other volatile chemicals that emit vapors that are capable of contaminating indoor air spaces.
Voggenthaler v. Maryland Square LLC, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 15307 (9th Cir. 7/26/13), arose from the seepage of dry cleaning solvents at a Las Vegas shopping center. The PCE contamination was first reported to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) in 2000. In 2005, the shopping center was purchased for redevelopment by Maryland Square LLC, which bought the property with knowledge of the ongoing investigation. In 2006, Maryland Square demolished the buildings to prepare the site for redevelopment.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Brownfield Properties, Chemicals, Contaminated Properties, Contamination, Environmental Claims, Land Developers, Lenders, Vapor Intrusion, Vapor Intrusion Guidance
Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Environmental Updates, Commercial Real Estate Updates, Toxic Torts Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Buchalter Nemer | Attorney Advertising