NO FISHING: Court Refuses to Enforce Overbroad "Pattern or Practice" Subpoena From EEOC

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP
Contact

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission got a slapdown recently from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The decision, which held that an EEOC subpoena was overbroad and sought information that was not relevant to the case, reinforces the limits of the agency's subpoena and discovery authority and prohibits the EEOC from trying to initiate "pattern and practice" discovery without a proper aggregation of claims.

In other words, the decision is good news for employers.

EEOC v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Ry. Co.

The EEOC generally has the authority to subpoena "any evidence of any person being investigated" as long as the evidence "related to the unlawful employment practices … and is relevant to the charge under investigation."

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP
Contact
more
less

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide