The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California recently ruled that a patent legal malpractice plaintiff was not judicially estopped from re-filing its lawsuit in federal court after initially filing it in state court. In E-Pass Technologies v. Moses & Singer, LLP, the plaintiff patent-holder sued its attorneys for malpractice after they lost multiple patent-infringement lawsuits and thereby subjected the company to substantial attorney-fee awards. The company initially filed its malpractice suit in California state court and litigated the issue of whether the court had jurisdiction. Based on narrow construction of the claims proffered by the company’s attorneys, the California Court of Appeal ruled that the claims did not raise substantial issues of patent law.
Later, while the state court action remained pending, the company filed a similar action for malpractice against the same attorneys in U.S. District Court. The company did this because it felt that the state court decision upholding jurisdiction was unduly restrictive. The company averred that it would dismiss the state court action once the federal court ruled that it had jurisdiction over the claims.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.