No Records is Not an Acceptable Excuse


Often taxpayers who have not filed Reports of Foreign Bank or Financial Accounts (FBAR’s) will claim that they do not have records of their offshore accounts, because the accounts are maintained by third parties. In many cases the absence of records precludes taxpayer’s from applying for the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP). Typical of absent records are circumstances where a taxpayer has (1) a custodial account, or (2) offshore trust, or (3) an offshore trust that controls an offshore corporation. Regardless of the situation, however, the taxpayer must be able to produce what are known as “required records”.

The Bank Secrecy Act has what is known as the “required records doctrine”, which mandates a taxpayer maintain records sufficient to establish offshore account balances, and interest and dividends earned for during the immediately preceding five years. The “Required Records Doctrine” has been used by the IRS Criminal Investigation Division in conjunction with Grand Jury actions to compel taxpayers to either produce records or give testimony about why the cannot produce the records of their offshore accounts. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination does not apply to testimony sought under the “Required Records Doctrine”, reasoning that the doctrine is essentially administrative/regulatory and not criminal in nature.

For those taxpayer’s who have accounts in financial institutions offshore and want to enter the OVDP in order to avoid “willful” penalties for not coming forward, the choice is to come forward with a skeleton OVDP letter and state that records are being sought or wait for the records to be produced. Time is not on the side of those who are waiting. The difference between waiting and coming forward could be the difference between timely enrollment in the OVDP. Not entering the OVDP can mean the loss of protection from penalties for unfilled information returns, such as foreign trust returns or Reports of Foreign Gifts or Bequests or Controlled Foreign Corporation or Controlled Foreign Partnership Returns all of which can be very significant. The penalty for failing to file a Report of Foreign Gift or Bequest in excess of $100,00 in a calendar year is 25% – 35% of the amount involved. But if the taxpayer can enter the OVDP then all unfilled information return penalties and FBAR penalties are rolled into a single civil miscellaneous penalty and in addition prosecution is avoided. But if the IRS finds the taxpayer before the taxpayer enters the OVDP then no protection from penalty assessment is available and the risk of prosecution exists.


Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sanford Millar, Law Offices of Sanford I. Millar | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


Sanford Millar
Law Offices of Sanford I. Millar

Experience and Qualifications: Over 30 years of experience in domestic and international tax... View Profile »

Follow Law Offices of Sanford I. Millar:

Reporters on Deadline

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.