No Revival Of Class Claims For Plaintiff Who Delayed Amending His Complaint In Bad Faith

more+
less-

An Illinois federal district court has ruled that a class plaintiff whose motion for class certification was denied may not avoid that outcome by amending his complaint to introduce a new legal theory and revised class definition if the complaint could have been amended prior to moving for class certification.

Chapman’s initial attempt to certify claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act failed because the Court found that individual issues would predominate and that the proposed class would be unascertainable, so Chapman filed a motion for leave amend his complaint to include a new class definition based on different alleged violations of the TCPA.

In its opinion denying the motion for leave to amend, the Court observed that the alleged merits of the revised class definition and theory were by no means newly discovered by Chapman more than a year and a half after the close of fact and expert discovery. The Court characterized Chapman’s “strategic” decision to delay seeking amendment until after the parties and Court expended time and resources considering Chapman’s failed first attempt at class certification as inappropriate “gamesmanship,” and a “second bite at the apple based on a theory that he could have pursued years ago.” The Court concluded that Chapman’s undue delay in seeking to amend the complaint was bad faith, and that to allow him to advance an entirely new proposed class definition and theory more than four years after he commenced his class action would be unduly prejudicial to the defendant.

Chapman v. First Index, Inc., No. 1:09-cv-05555 (N.D. Ill. July 16, 2014).

Topics:  Amended Complaints, Bad Faith, Class Action, Class Certification, TCPA

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Communications & Media Updates, Consumer Protection Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carlton Fields Jorden Burt | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »