Nonobviousness: Practical Guidelines to Defeating an Obviousness Rejection by Kenneth Horton


Originally published in Bloomberg Law Reports - Intellectual Property, March 5, 2012.Vol 6 No 10.

One of the common obstacles preventing a patent application from being issued by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office ("USPTO") is the dreaded "obviousness rejection," where the examiner rejects the applicaton on the basis that the invention is "obvious" in light of one or more prior art references ("prior art"). As a former patent examiner, there are several guidelines I follow when replying to these rejections.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kirton McConkie PC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Kirton McConkie PC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.