North Carolina Trial Court Rules Unconstitutional State Law Transferring Ownership of City's Water System

more+
less-

Last summer, we blogged here about the dispute between the North Carolina General Assembly -- okay, the "State" -- and the City of Asheville over the State's efforts to transfer ownership and operation of the City's water system to the hands of a Metropolitan Water and Sewerage District.  By sale?  No.  By state law.

You can view Session Law 2013-50, which we'll call the "Water Act", here.
 

Not much has happened from a practical standpoint since we last blogged--the State and the City have agreed to extend the TRO issued by the Wake County Superior Court, which prevented the application of the law, pending some litigation steps.  However, much has happened since we last blogged from a litigation standpoint--pleadings have been amended, discovery has taken place (and been disputed), and dispositive motions have been filed and argued before the Superior Court.

Yesterday, the Wake County Superior Court issued a final ruling in the City's favor.  Essentially, the Court concluded as a matter of law that (1) the Water Act is a local act running afoul of the North Carolina Constitution, (2) the Water Act runs afoul of the North Carolina Constitution and its guarantees to equal protection of the law, (3) the Water Act is not a valid exercise of the sovereign powers to condemn or take property, (4) in the alternative to conclusion (3), in the event the Water Act is a valid exercise of the sovereign taking power, the City is entitled to just compensation in excess of one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000.00).

You can view the Court's ruling here.  The Court anticipates the State's appeal: "This procedure makes good sense because this case, no matter what the outcome, will be appealed to the appellate division". We're not so sure, however.  The State had its day in Court.

In the meantime, we'll keep pace with the flow.

"Wonder Twins power, activate!"  
"Form of, municipal water system!"  
"Form of, legislative fiat transferring ownership of that water system!"
 

 

Topics:  Eminent Domain, Takings, Transfer of Title, Water

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Energy & Utilities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »