Not Every Rear-End Collision Is the Exclusive Fault of the Rearmost Driver

Marshall Dennehey
Contact

McAvoy v. Eighamri, 194 N.Y.S.3d 147, 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 04202

A passenger in the leading vehicle, a taxi, filed suit for personal injuries against the driver of the leading vehicle, the driver of the following vehicle, and the owner of the following vehicle after a rear-end collision. The leading driver filed a motion for summary judgment, which was denied by the Supreme Court, Kings County.

This court affirmed, holding that there is a triable issue of fact as to whether the leading driver was also at fault, precluding summary judgment. A triable issue of fact existed as to whether the leading driver was fully stopped for a red light when his taxi was rear-ended by following vehicle, or whether he accelerated in an attempt to beat a yellow traffic light and then came to a sudden stop in the middle of an intersection when the light was still yellow.

The court notes that, in addition to duties of an approaching vehicle to maintain a reasonably safe distance and speed, the frontmost driver has a duty to not stop suddenly or slow down without proper signaling.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Marshall Dennehey | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Marshall Dennehey
Contact
more
less

Marshall Dennehey on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide