According to the Notice below:
Representative Plaintiffs alleged five causes of action against Google: (1) Breach of Contract; (2) Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; (3) Violations of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code ï¿½ 17200, et seq. ("UCL"); (4) Violation of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code ï¿½ 17500, et seq. ("FAL"); and (5) Unjust Enrichment based on Google's alleged practice of (1) charging its AdWords advertisers up to 120% of their per day daily budget on any given day (Plaintiffs' "120% claims"); and (2) charging AdWords customers who paused their campaigns more than their per day Daily Budget times the number of days their campaigns were not paused during the billing period.
The Court dismissed the claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and unjust enrichment, and also held that Google's practice of charging AdWords Advertisers up to 120% of their daily budget on any given day does not, in and of itself, constitute breach of contract. However, the Court held that triable issues of fact existed as to whether Google's practice of charging up to 120% of an AdWords Advertiser's per day Daily Budget violates the UCL and FAL and whether Google's pre-September 2006 pausing practices constitute a breach of contract.
To settle this action, Google has paid $20,000,000 into escrow on behalf of the Class. The Settlement Proceeds would distributed to the Class in accordance with the terms of the Plan of Allocation described below.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.