NPDB Guidebook revision would clarify investigation reporting issues


Physicians always have been justifiably concerned about reports to the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) regarding malpractice payments and adverse peer review actions. Two areas of frequent uncertainty have been:

1) Reporting malpractice payments made on behalf of entities, typically hospitals, when the individual physicians have been dismissed from the malpractice actions; and

2) Determining whether physicians should be reported if they have resigned while a peer review action

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the division of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) responsible for administering the data bank, has just proposed a revision to the NPDB Guidebook. The current version of the Guidebook was published in September 2001, so it is past due for an update.

Originally published in ACMC Bulletin - December 2013.

Please see full report below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Tucker Arensberg, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Tucker Arensberg, P.C. on:

Popular Topics
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.