NY’s Highest Court Shields Hedge Fund From Liability For Terminating Chief Compliance Officer Who Complained Internally of Alleged Manipulative and Deceptive Trading Practices By Owner


On May 8, 2012, the New York Court of Appeals issued the latest decision to address whether an at will employee who complains internally of alleged illegal acts, has protection from firing.

In Sullivan v. Harnisch, 2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 03574, 2012 WL 1580602, New York’s highest court ruled that the Chief Compliance Officer of a hedge fund who claims to have objected to “front running” (selling of stock by hedge fund owners/employees in anticipation of transactions by its own clients) was not entitled to protection from firing, and his claim for wrongful termination was dismissed.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kevin O'Connor, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.