NZ Patent Oppositions – Why Do I Need Expert Evidence?

by FPA Patent Attorneys
Contact

In our continuing series of articles on New Zealand patent oppositions, we look at the topic of expert evidence and why it is critical to establishing obviousness.

Where a difference exists between the invention and the prior art, the opponent will need to rely upon the ground of obviousness to establish invalidity.

Test for obviousness/inventive step

The approach adopted by New Zealand courts in assessing obviousness is the same as that adopted in England under the UK Patents Act 1977 as laid out by the Court of Appeal in Windsurfing International Inc. v Tabur Marine (GB) Ltd. [1985] RPC 59.

The court set out a four-fold test for assessing inventive step:

  1. Identify the inventive concept embodied in the patent;
  2. Impute to a normally skilled but unimaginative addressee what was common general knowledge in the art at the priority date;
  3. Identify the differences, if any, between the matter cited and the alleged invention; and
  4. Decide whether those differences, viewed without any knowledge of the alleged invention, constituted steps which would have been obvious to the skilled man or whether they required any degree of invention.

Without expert evidence, the New Zealand Patent Office has held that it is unable to come to a conclusion of obviousness. So evidence becomes crucial in any case relying on obviousness.

The importance of common general knowledge

At the very minimum, evidence should be provided to establish the state of common general knowledge in the field in New Zealand as at the priority date (step 2). One way of establishing the state of common general knowledge in the field is through the testimony of an “expert witness” who is typically a person skilled in that field. Another way of establishing the state of common general knowledge may be through textbooks, standard reference materials and articles in relevant international journals. But even so, these materials are usually obtained through the assistance of an expert and confirmation of the expert’s awareness of knowledge contained in the reference materials is also beneficial to the case.

In some cases, patent specifications may fall within the realm of common general knowledge although this is usually confined to industries where skilled workers in the field would typically review patent specifications to monitor developments in their field. Again, expert evidence may be required to show that monitoring of patents is prevalent in the field.

In our earlier article NZ Patent Oppositions – Why oppose?, we discussed why it is more difficult to succeed under obviousness where all the features of the invention can only be found in a mosaic of two prior art documents, compared to the situation where a single prior art document and the common general knowledge contains all the features of the invention.

So, in practice, the evidence tries to establish that any differences between the invention and a prior art document are part of the common general knowledge.

Expert Witnesses

Such evidence is usually obtained from one or more “expert witnesses” in the field in New Zealand. The expert witness usually has a specialized knowledge in that particular field in New Zealand and is able to testify as to the state of the common general knowledge in New Zealand. The hypothetical skilled addressee referred to in step 2 is considered to be “unimaginative”. However, in practice, the expert witness may be an expert in the field and little attention is paid as to whether the expert is over-qualified or too inventive.

The expert’s evidence should establish independence from the parties to the dispute.

The more the expert departs from the ideal, the greater the likelihood that the evidence will be held to have low probative value.

Expert’s view on obviousness

Generally speaking, the expert’s view as to whether an invention is obvious or not (step 4) is not appropriate in evidence since this is a matter for the court or the hearing officer to determine.

It may be useful to have the expert’s interpretation of any prior art documents. In particular, the expert may point to where claimed features can be found in the prior art. Additionally, the expert, as a skilled reader of the prior art document may understand it differently from a non-skilled reader and thus shed light on otherwise unclear passages or elucidate features that might be inherent only to a skilled reader.

Perhaps, the expert can be shown the prior art and can provide testimony as to what alternative solutions might have presented themselves to the expert as at the priority date. If the alternative solution includes the invention then this would strongly suggest a lack of inventive step. Such evidence could be particularly persuasive if the expert is not aware of the invention and can testify as being unaware of the claimed invention.

Ideally, the expert should explain his reasoning as much as possible. The conclusions are not so important as the his reasoning.

Thus, expert evidence, particularly on matters of common general knowledge and interpretation of prior art plays a crucial role in opposition proceedings.

Further articles in this series

This is the fourth instalment of a multi-part series on New Zealand patent oppositions. Other articles include:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© FPA Patent Attorneys | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

FPA Patent Attorneys
Contact
more
less

FPA Patent Attorneys on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!