NZ to decide on software patents

by FPA Patent Attorneys
Contact

[authors: Karen Bentley & Joe Mok]

Four years after the New Zealand Patents Bill was first introduced, it looks like first light of a new Patents Act will soon be shining on to the land of the long white cloud. The Bill recently received its second reading on 12 September 2012 in the New Zealand Parliament. Among the debated issues is the controversial exclusion of computer software from patentability.

Background

The Commerce Select Committee released a report in 2010 recommending, amongst other things, that computer programs be universally banned from patent eligibility[1]. This recommendation, along with the draft guidelines[2] and their explanatory memorandum issued by IPONZ on patentability of inventions involving computer programs, created a first wave of concerns from industry groups[3], such as Fisher and Paykel, who argued that the ban would unintentionally exclude embedded software or systems from being patentable.

Recent amendments

Amendments to the Bill have recently been proposed by the Minister of Commerce in a Supplementary Order Paper[4] to remove the not-so-well received proposal on the universal patentability exclusion of computer programs. Instead, a new clause specifically dealing with computer programs is proposed to be added to the new legislation as follows:

10A     Computer programs
(1) A computer program is not an invention for the purposes of this Act.

(2) Subsection (1) prevents anything from being an invention for the purposes of this Act only to the extent that a patent or an application relates to a computer program as such. (with our emphasis)

Subsection (2) as proposed effectively places a partial exclusion on patentability of computer programs and seeks to address the above concern of the industry. The “as such” proviso is borrowed from Europe, where computer-implemented inventions may be protected by patents if they exhibit an inventive “technical” contribution or effect[5] (as opposed to, for example, a method of doing business). This is especially true if the invention involves providing a technical solution to a technical problem.

Of course there is no guarantee that the European jurisprudence is to be followed in New Zealand. It may well be the case that the New Zealand courts will develop their own interpretation of the “as such” proviso quite different from that of Europe.

Opposing voices

Unsurprisingly, this latest proposed amendment has created opposing voices from industry groups including Orion Healthcare and Jade Corporation (which are said to collectively produce over 50% of software exported from New Zealand). In less than two weeks after the above amendments were proposed, more than 1000 individuals and representatives signed a joint petition[6] to the Minister of Commerce to push for alternative wording to the amended clause. Interestingly, the exact same wording was subsequently proposed by an opposition party in a Supplementary Order Paper[7], which was introduced one day after the petition is dated. Both the joint petition and the opposition party advocate an alternative to subsection (2) to read “[s]ubsection (1) does not prevent an invention that makes use of an embedded computer program from being patentable” (with our emphasis). 

It is not entirely clear what would be required of a computer program to be “embedded” and therefore be patent eligible under this alternative wording. Would a computer program need to be physically located within a piece of equipment over which it has control in order to be considered “embedded”? Could a computer program that is run remotely, say over a wireless link, yet physically separately from that equipment be considered “embedded”? Indeed, the joint petition itself acknowledges the term is not defined and is for the New Zealand courts to decide. A member of the opposition party conveniently commented that this alternative wording “leaves the boundaries of embedded software to be determined by the Government on a case by case basis, as is appropriate”.

It is one thing to determine whether a particular embedded system or a particular piece of embedded software would fall under the “as such” proviso. It is quite another to hard-code technical terms such as “embedded computer program” in legislation without clearly defining what they would or would not encapsulate. Based on our hypothetical questions above and the admissions from various parties, it does not seem the alternative wording provides any more certainty than does the seemingly more flexible “as such” proviso.

What happens next

The Bill is now being prepared for its third reading before it is passed as law. At this stage, there appears almost even support for the two alternatives of the wording in Clause 10A, with the numbers slightly favouring the “as such” proviso. Regardless of which side of the politics prevails, uncertainty will remain for some time for patent applicants and holders as to the patent eligibility of computer-implemented inventions.

(For interested readers, a recent discussion contrasting between the US and Australian positions can be found here.)

[1] Patents Bill, as reported from the Commerce Committee
[2] Examination guidelines: Patentability of inventions involving computer programs
[3] Submissions on the draft guidelines for the examination of patent applications involving computer programs
[4] Supplementary Order Paper No 120
[5] T 0154/04, EPO Board of Appeal
[6] Letter to Minister of Commerce from Institute of IT Professionals NZ et al.
[7] Supplementary Order Paper No 123

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© FPA Patent Attorneys | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

FPA Patent Attorneys
Contact
more
less

FPA Patent Attorneys on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!