October 2012: International Arbitration Litigation Update

by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Contact


In recent years, a hotly contested issue in international arbitration practice has been the extent to which parties to foreign seated arbitrations can employ 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to obtain discovery in the U.S. for use in the arbitration. In a decision of potentially great significance, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently held that a party engaged in a private foreign arbitration may employ Section 1782 to obtain discovery in the U.S. The decision creates a split with the Fifth and Second Circuits, which had both previously precluded discovery in aid of private foreign arbitrations, allowing it only in the service of foreign state-sponsored adjudicatory proceedings. The Eleventh Circuit’s decision heralds potentially significant opportunities for parties to obtain discovery in aid of foreign commercial arbitrations, while exposing those within the Eleventh Circuit’s jurisdiction to potentially enlarged discovery burdens, even as non-parties to foreign arbitral proceedings.

The Section 1782 Discovery Mechanism: Section 1782 is a powerful tool for Federal Court assistance in gathering evidence for use in foreign proceedings. Under the Section, a U.S. court may grant discovery where: (a) the person from whom the discovery is sought is found in the Court’s district; (b) the application is made by a foreign or international tribunal or “any interested person”; and (c) the evidence is for use in a proceeding before a “foreign or international tribunal.” Although the Section’s language is relatively clear, controversy has long persisted over (i) whether Congress intended the term “tribunal” to include arbitral panels, and, if so, (ii) whether that definition is broad enough to encompass both governmental or state-sponsored arbitral panels (such as those established under NAFTA or the World Bank’s International Convention for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)) as well as arbitration panels presiding over private commercial cases.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 542 U.S. 241 (2004), suggested that a private arbitral tribunal may fall within the scope of Section 1782, but the Court did not decide the issue. Before the Intel decision, both the Second and Fifth Circuits held that Section 1782 does not permit discovery assistance to foreign private commercial arbitration tribunals. See Republic of Kazakhstan v. Biedermann Int’l, 168 F.3d 880 (5th Cir. 1999); Broadcasting Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co., 165 F.3d 184, 191 (2d Cir. 1999). District Courts reviewing the issue since the Intel decision have divided on the question.

The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision: Splitting with the Second and Fifth Circuits, the Eleventh Circuit recently held that a party engaged in a private foreign arbitration can rely on 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to obtain discovery from persons or companies located in the U.S. for use in that arbitration. Consorcio Ecuatoriano de Telecomunicaciones S.A. v. JAS Forwarding (USA), Inc., 685 F.3d 987 (11th Cir. 2012). The case concerned a foreign shipping contract billing dispute between wireless communications operator, Consorcio Ecuatoriano de Telecomunicaciones S.A. (“CONECEL”) and an air freight carrier, Jet Air Service Equador S.A. (“JASE”). JASE commenced arbitration proceedings against CONECEL in Ecuador. Thereafter, CONECEL filed an ex parte application in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to obtain discovery from JASE’s U.S. counterpart, JAS Forwarding (USA), Inc. The District Court granted the application and denied JASE’s subsequent motion to quash.

In affirming the District Court’s order, the Eleventh Circuit, relying heavily on the Intel decision, held that the arbitral tribunal before which the dispute was pending was a “foreign tribunal” for purposes of Section 1782. It reasoned that the statutory requirements for judicial assistance were met here because: (i) the arbitral panel acted as a first-instance decisionmaker; (ii) it permitted the gathering and submission of evidence; (iii) it would resolve the dispute; (iv) it would issue a binding order; and (v) its order would be subject to judicial review. Section 1782, according to the panel, “requires nothing more.” Id. at 990. The Eleventh Circuit distinguished the contrary holdings of the Second and Fifth Circuits as being at odds with the broader and more functional definition of a “tribunal” posited in Intel.

Impact of Decision and the Path Forward: Although the CONESCO decision is binding only within the Eleventh Circuit, its impact is nevertheless likely to be significant. It provides a potent tool—essentially opening up the panoply of discovery devices under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure—to parties to foreign arbitral proceedings who may wish to obtain discovery within the Eleventh Circuit’s jurisdiction (Alabama, Florida and Georgia), whether or not they are parties to those proceedings. Indeed, one of the hallmarks of Section 1782 discovery is that it does not inquire whether such discovery would be available in the foreign proceedings. Thus, it is possible for parties to obtain far broader discovery through Section 1782 than would normally be authorized in the arbitration itself.

It is yet to be seen whether other Courts will adopt the Eleventh Circuit’s position. It seems likely though that this question will at some point return to the Supreme Court. The Eleventh Circuit’s split with the Fifth and Second Circuits is arguably not yet ripe for review, because both of those Circuit’s decisions disallowing Section 1782 discovery in aid of foreign private arbitral tribunals pre-dated the Supreme Court’s 2004 Intel decision. However, future published decisions confirming those earlier holdings could well provide a basis for the Supreme Court to again weigh in. In the meantime, for better or worse, the courts in the Eleventh Circuit may well become a magnet for discovery applications in aid of foreign arbitrations.

Other International Arbitration Practice News: In other news, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia recently cited favorably to an article published by New York international arbitration associate, Lucas Bento, in the Berkeley Journal of International Law. Mr. Bento’s article, Toward an International Law of Piracy Sui Generis: How the Dual Nature of Maritime Piracy Law Enables Piracy to Flourish, 29 Berkeley J. Int’l L. 399, 418 (2011), examines international law and jurisprudence on maritime piracy. It is quoted twice in the D.C. Court’s opinion in United States v. Ali Mohamed Ali, No. 11-0106, 2012 WL 2870263 (D.D.C., July 13, 2012).

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Contact
more
less

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.