October 2013 Bonus Case Summaries: California: Costs Interpreted Narrowly in Tech Dispute

more+
less-

Ancora Tech., Inc. v. Apple, Inc., 2013 WL 4532927 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2013).   In this patent law case, the plaintiff moved to review the bill of costs previously awarded to the defendant. The court weighed the costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, which lists several enumerated costs that may be awarded under FRCP 54(d). The standard of review was whether the conduct could be construed as making copies or exemplification. The court ruled that costs associated with TIFF and OCR conversion, printing documents, and deposition transcripts are reasonably within the enumerated categories of § 1920 costs. However, the court was very narrow in its interpretation: costs associated with the storage of electronic documents and visual aids were not permissible. The court further discussed that costs requested to be covered must be fully defined; therefore, costs labeled with ambiguous terms were not recoverable. The court lowered the costs of the case accordingly.

Topics:  Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Patent Litigation, Patents

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Electronic Discovery Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kroll Ontrack Inc. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »