One Example Of Treatment Of The Dissemination Risk Under E&O Coverage: Consideration of Finn v. National Union, 452 Mass. 690 (2008).

more+

less-

1/22/2009

Joseph Sano Contact

Send

A rogue worker's gift to the "hacker community" held not covered under litigation service provider's E&O insurance as an excluded misappropriation of trade secret according to a recent Massachusetts SJC decision(Finn v. Nat'l Union, 452 Mass. 690 (2008)). The implications of this decision including the need for specialized privacy breach insurance are addressed in this posting from Prince, Lobel's insurance blog: Consider the Risks.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Intellectual Property Updates, Privacy Updates, Insurance Updates, Professional Malpractice Updates

Send Report

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.