Opinion of Prof. Lokke Moerel of Morrison & Foerster on the impact of the ECJ Safe Harbor Decision on the alternative transfer mechanisms: “Schrems decision has no impact on the lawfulness and viability of the alternative mechanisms for data transfers”

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

Crucial decision by Working Party 29 expected February 3, 2016 on validity of Standard Contractual Clauses and Binding Corporate Rules for data transfers to U.S.

Following the judgement of the European Court of Justice in Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner invalidating the Safe Harbor for data transfers to the U.S., companies rely on alternative basis for their data transfer to the U.S., such as Standard Contractual Clauses and Binding Corporate Rules. The Working Party 29 is scheduled to convene for a plenary meeting at 2 and 3 February to discuss consequences of the Schrems judgment, which must inevitably include the impact on the alternative data transfer mechanisms, and will decide whether companies can continue relying on Standard Contractual Clauses and Binding Corporate Rules. If the alternative mechanism would be invalidated, companies are left with no alternative mechanisms to legalize their transfers to the U.S.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide