Grogan v. Paolella, et al.

Opposition to Demurrer

more+
less-

Defendant filed a demurrer, arguing that Plaintiff failed to state a cause of action for defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The court agreed with Plaintiff and overruled the demurrer.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Personal Injury Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motion Addressed to Pleadings | State, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Adrianos M. Facchetti, LAW OFFICES OF ADRIANOS M. FACCHETTI | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

Adrianos M. Facchetti
LAW OFFICES OF ADRIANOS M. FACCHETTI

The Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti is a defamation and personal injury law firm that is dedicated... View Profile »


Follow LAW OFFICES OF ADRIANOS M. FACCHETTI:

Reporters on Deadline