Scheier v. City of Snohomish, et al.

Order Denying Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment

more+
less-

This was a civil rights case where a photographer who was detained for photographing power lines near a power-station brought claims based on her detention and arrest. Defendants moved for summary judgment based on qualified immunity and on the issue of municipal liability. The court denied the motions, ruling that (1) the Defendant-officers effected an arrest and lacked adequate justification for escalating the Terry stop and (2) the City was not entitled to summary judgment on the issue of municipal liability because it had ratified the conduct of the officers.

I handled the case as a cooperating attorney for the ACLU of Washington.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Art, Entertainment & Sports Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Rights Updates, Communications & Media Updates, Constitutional Law Updates

Reference Info:Decision | Federal, 9th Circuit, Washington | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Venkat Balasubramani, Focal PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »