University Communications Inc. v. Net Access Corp

Order on Judgment


Our clients, the plaintiffs, had achieved virtually all of their litigation goals by virtue of a preliminary injunction granted after a temporary restraining order early in the litigation (via predecessor counsel). We elected to drop our affirmative counterclaims as such but to retain both the factual allegations and legal theories as setoffs while permitting the defendants to proceed with their counterclaims, at trial, as if they were plaintiffs.

At the close of defendants' counterclaim case in chief, we moved for judgment as a matter of law (i.e., a directed verdict) dismissing them all, which was granted.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Torts Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, General Business Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates

Reference Info:Decision | State, 3rd Circuit, New Jersey | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ronald Coleman, Goetz Fitzpatrick LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »