Oregon Supreme Court Revives Century-Old Statute to Award Attorney’s Fees to Policyholder

by Carlton Fields
Contact

The general rule regarding a party’s responsibility for legal fees in U.S. courts, known as the “American Rule,” provides that, barring a contrary contractual obligation or statute, each party is responsible for its own legal fees, regardless of a dispute’s outcome. Although statutory exceptions to this rule are many, the overwhelming majority of those exceptions require that the person receiving a fee award at least be the prevailing party.

Not so in Oregon — or at least not quite so — thanks to the Supreme Court of Oregon’s recent decision Long v. Farmers Insurance Co., 360 Or. 791 (Feb. 2, 2017). The Long court held that a century-old statute, ORS 742.061, entitled the insured to attorney fees, despite the insured’s loss at trial. The statute, which suggests an apparent attempt by the post-WWI Oregon legislature to incentivize increased clairvoyance by the insurance industry, commands insurers to pay their insured’s attorney fees should the insured obtain, during a court action, a “recovery” exceeding the amount of any tender made by the insurer during the first six months following the first filed proof of loss.

Fortunately for Oregon insurers, recovery for fees is not unlimited even under this curious standard. Hopefully, this alleviates any fears that this ruling will spark a tide of insured-driven litigation.

A Rare Successful Kitchen Sink Approach

The unorthodox result in Long was driven by a pedestrian claim: the insured discovered a leak under her kitchen sink but not before the leak caused significant damage to her home.

The insured filed a claim with her insurer, who, about a month later, voluntarily paid the insured about $3,300, representing the sum the insurer determined was equivalent to the actual cash value of the insured’s losses minus her deductible, plus another $2,170 in mitigation expenses. The payment was predictably less money than the insured claimed in two cash value proofs of loss submitted to the insurer around the same time that she received the roughly $5,500 payment. Significantly, the insured did not submit a replacement cost proof of loss.

The parties were in the same place a year later, prompting the insured to bring suit claiming the insurer had not paid the full sums due nor submitted to the required appraisal process. The insurer agreed with the latter contention, and after the court-ordered appraisal process was complete, made two additional payments to the insured, totaling approximately $7,250, six months after suit was filed.

Another six months later, on the eve of trial, the insured submitted a proof of loss for her replacement costs. Three days later, the insurer paid the insured another $4,200 in response. Trial commenced, and as the insured did not recover an amount greater than she already received from the insurer, the trial court entered judgment in the insurer’s favor.

The insured nevertheless filed a petition for attorney fees under ORS 742.061, which, as would ordinarily be expected when the losing party attempts to recover fees, the trial court denied, holding that the “recovery” referred to in the statute meant a judgment. The appellate court affirmed the ruling without opinion.

ORS 742.061 Monetary “Recovery” Does Not Require Judgment

The Oregon high court concluded that to trigger a fee award under ORS 742.061, “an insured must obtain a monetary recovery after filing an action, although that recovery need not be memorialized in a judgment.” (underlines added). One bright spot for Oregon insurers is that fee recovery was limited to those fees accrued through the date of the $7,250 payment – the one that was made after the appraisal process was completed, as that was the date the insured received all money to which she was entitled for the cash value proofs of loss.

In support, the court found that ORS 742.061’s use of “recovery” was ambiguous, as it could reasonably be read to require either a monetary judgment or mere monetary payments from the insurer exceeding the amount of tender made during the first six months after proof of loss.

In light of the ambiguity, the court relied on the policy purposes of the statute, reasoning:

Requiring the insurer to pay the insured’s attorney fees if and only if the insured obtains more in the litigation than was timely tendered advances that purpose insofar as it encourages insurers to make reasonable and timely offers of settlement and also encourages insureds to accept reasonable offers and forego litigation. But the statute also serves a compensatory purpose. The statute ensures that, when insureds file suit to obtain what is due to them under their policies, they do not win the battle but lose the war by expending much or all of what they obtained in the litigation on attorney fees.

Applying the holding to the kitchen sink claim, the court found the insured was entitled to fees with respect to the cash value proofs of loss because:

Although it is true that Farmers made its payments to plaintiff after the appraisal process had concluded, both the appraisal proceeding and the payments came more than six months after plaintiff’s proof of loss and after plaintiff had instituted her action. And, at least initially, whether Farmers had wrongfully failed to engage in the appraisal process was an issue in the action. In those circumstances, we conclude that Farmers’ belated payments qualify as a recovery “in the action.”

However, the court limited the fee recovery to those fees that accrued through the date of the $7,500 payment for two reasons.

Once the Insured Recovers the Sum Total Recovery, There Is No Entitlement to Additional Fees

As the court explained:

Except for the two replacement cost payments that Farmers made in February 2014, plaintiff did not recover, after August 2013, any amount over and above what Farmers already had paid. At trial, plaintiff sought but was unsuccessful in obtaining any greater sum. Thus, because plaintiff’s recovery after Farmers’ August 2013 payment did not exceed Farmers’ timely tender, plaintiff is not entitled to attorney fees under ORS 742.061 for work performed by her attorney after that date.

The takeaway is that even though fees can be triggered by ORS 742.061 after six months have passed, the insurer is no longer responsible for fees once the full claim has been recovered by the insured, regardless of whether litigation continues.

A Cash Value Proof of Loss Is Not a Replacement Cost Proof of Loss

The court made clear that the insurer’s obligations for replacement cost under ORS 742.061 were not triggered until the insured submitted the replacement cost proof of loss:

Farmers made those payments within days after plaintiff filed proof of her replacement costs—the “proof of loss” that would justify paying the replacement cost, rather than the actual cash value, of plaintiff’s losses. It was that later proof of loss that triggered the six-month period for settlement of plaintiff’s claim for the replacement value of her losses under ORS 742.061. Because Farmers made the replacement cost payments within the six-month window for settlement provided in the statute, plaintiff is not entitled to reimbursement for attorney fees incurred in obtaining that additional “recovery.”

Bottom Line: Be Reasonable

One striking aspect of this case is how a relatively small claim could trigger significant attorney fee obligations for both the insurer and insured. Had the insurer paid the $7,250 additional payment during the first six months, it would not have been on the hook for any fees. On the insured side, had she accepted that the $7,500 payment was a reasonable payment for her claim and dropped her remaining suit for cash value payments, she could have avoided paying attorney fees for that claim from the date of the payment, August 2013, through at least the date of the Long opinion, February 2017. This case illustrates the importance of timely communication and good faith dealing between the insurer and insured.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carlton Fields | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Carlton Fields
Contact
more
less

Carlton Fields on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.