Orrick's Financial Industry Week In Review - August 6, 2012

by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

Financial Industry Developments

 

Extension of Deadline for Independent Foreclosure Review

On August 2, the Fed and the OCC extended the deadline for borrowers seeking a review of their mortgage foreclosures under the federal banking agencies’ Independent Foreclosure Review to December 31.  The new deadline provides additional time for borrowers to request a review if they believe they suffered financial injury as a result of errors in foreclosure actions on their homes in 2009 or 2010 by one of the servicers covered by enforcement actions issued in April 2011.  Fed Release.   

Freddie Mac Amendments for LTV Ratios

On July 31, Freddie Mac announced plans to amend the Relief Refinance Mortgage Program, which includes the Home Affordable Refinance Program, to align requirements for mortgages with LTV ratios equal to or less than 80% with those of mortgages with LTV ratios greater than 80%.  The alignment will eliminate many of the lender's selling representation and warranty responsibilities on the original loans being refinanced, regardless of the borrower's LTV ratio.  Details are scheduled to be announced to lenders by mid-September.  Freddie Mac Release.   

Fed Rule on Risk-Management Standards for FMUs

On July 30, the Fed approved a final rule, Regulation HH, implementing provisions of sections 805(a) and 806(e) of the Dodd-Frank Act.  The final rule establishes risk-management standards related to the payment, clearing, and settlement activities of certain financial market utilities (FMUs) designated as systemically important by the FSOC, and standards for determining when a designated FMU must provide advance notice of proposed changes to its rules, procedures, or operations.  The rule will be effective on September 14.  Fed Release.  Final Rule.  

SEC Issues Recommendations to Improve Municipal Securities Market

On July 31, the SEC issued a report containing recommendations related to the municipal securities market.  The report proposed a number of legislative changes to further regulate the industry.  Specific topics included improving disclosure, structuring the market, and industry best practices. SEC Release.  SEC Report.

Rating Agency Developments

 

On August 3, Fitch updated its Asia-Pacific RMBS criteria. Fitch Report.

On August 3, Fitch updated its Australian RMBS criteria.  Fitch Report.

On August 3, DBRS updated its Canadian provincial government criteria.  DBRS Report.

On August 3, DBRS updated its Canadian municipal government criteria.  DBRS Report.

On August 2, Fitch updated its criteria for toll roads, bridges, and tunnels.  Fitch Report.

On August 2, Fitch updated its criteria for rating caps in global structured finance transactions.  Fitch Report.

On August 2, Fitch updated its Asia-Pacific consumer ABS criteria.  Fitch Report.  

On July 30, Fitch updated its Italian residential mortgage criteria assumptions.  Fitch Report.

On July 30, Moody’s released its methodology for covered bonds.  Moody’s Report.


Note:  Free registration is required for rating agency releases and reports. 

RMBS Litigation

 

US$693 Million RMBS Case Against Goldman Sachs Settled for US$26.6 Million

On July 31, the Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi moved for approval of a US$26.6 million settlement of an RMBS class action pending before Judge Baer of the Southern District of New York.  Plaintiffs asserted claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 against Goldman Sachs arising out of the purchase of US$693 million in RMBS.  The complaint alleged that the offering documents contained inaccuracies and omissions, and that Goldman failed to conduct adequate due diligence.  In seeking approval of the settlement, plaintiffs argued that they faced litigation risk due to the limited precedent in RMBS class actions at the summary judgment stage and strong affirmative defenses asserted by the defendants.  Motion.  

IndyMac Reaches Partial Settlement of RMBS Claims

Five former IndyMac executives have reached settlements with the plaintiffs in two RMBS class actions.  On  July 31 the lead plaintiff in the consolidated class actions filed a motion for approval of a US$6 million settlement of outstanding claims brought under 1933 Act Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15.  In their motion for approval, Plaintiffs argue that the settlement is reasonable, among other reasons, because of concerns that the insurance policies covering the individual defendants will soon be exhausted.  Even if the settlement is approved, the case will continue against various non-settling defendants, including the underwriters for the RMBS transactions at issue.  Motion.   

RMBS Cases Against UBS Dismissed as Time-Barred

On July 31, Judge Cecchi of the District of New Jersey dismissed with prejudice as time-barred claims filed by the Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers alleging misstatements and omissions in the offering documents for US$5 million in RMBS.  Judge Cecchi determined that there were adequate storm warnings more than a year prior to the date when plaintiffs filed their claims that the originators of the loans underlying the securities at issue had abandoned their underwriting guidelines.  The court held that this was sufficient to put the plaintiffs on inquiry notice and to trigger the running of the statute of limitations for their 1933 Act claims.  A previous complaint had been dismissed as time barred with leave to amend, but the court determined that a second amended complaint would be futile and dismissed with prejudice.  Order.  

European Financial Industry Developments

 

Terms of Reference for Wheatley Review of LIBOR Published

On July 30, HM Treasury published a press release setting out the terms of reference for the independent review of LIBOR to be carried out by Martin Wheatley, Chief Executive-designate of the Financial Conduct Authority. Press Release.

Issues to be considered are:

  • Whether participation in the setting of LIBOR should be a regulated activity.
  • The construction of LIBOR, including the feasibility of using actual trade data to set the benchmark.
  • The appropriate governance structure for LIBOR.
  • The potential for alternative rate-setting processes.
  • The financial stability consequences of a move to a new regime and how a transition could be appropriately managed.
  • The adequacy and scope of sanctions for tackling LIBOR abuse. In particular, it will cover the scope of the UK authorities' civil and criminal sanctioning powers with respect to financial misconduct, particularly market abuse and abuse relating to the setting of LIBOR and equivalent rate-setting processes, as well as the FSA's approved persons regime and investigations into market misconduct.

There will be a four-week public consultation starting on August 10 with Mr. Wheatley aiming to publish his conclusions and recommendations by the end of September. The UK government intends to implement the findings of the review in the Financial Services Bill 2012-13. 

SFO Confirms Criminal Offences are Capable of Covering LIBOR Conduct

On July 30, the Serious Fraud Office (“SFO”) published a press release stating that the Director of the Serious Fraud Office, David Green QC, is satisfied that existing criminal offences are capable of covering conduct relating to the alleged manipulation of LIBOR and related interest rates.  Press Release.  

German Legislation to Regulate Algorithmic Traders and Trading Strategies on German Trading Venues

On July 30, the German Ministry of Finance presented new draft legislation in the form of an “Act for the Prevention of Risks and the Abuse of High Frequency Trading” (Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Vermeidung von Gefahren und Missbräuchen im Hochfrequenzhandel). 

Highlights include:

  • Inclusion of an extended definition of proprietary trading which will trigger a license requirement as a financial services institution under the German Banking Act as well as supervision by the German financial authority (“BaFin”).
  • High Frequency Trading (“HFT”) firms will be subject to the general regulatory framework applicable to investment firms under the German Banking Act and the German Securities Trading Act including a proposed “speed limit” for electronic trading in its regulated markets and multilateral trading facilities.
  • Investment firms, management companies and investment companies that are engaged in algorithmic trading would be subject to specific organisational requirements.
  • Trading participants will be obligated to ensure an adequate ratio between their purchase and sales orders and transactions which are actually executed.
  • Increased Enforcement Powers of Stock Exchange Supervisory Authorities and BaFin.
  • Certain HFT strategies will in the future fall under the revised German market abuse rules.

The new legislation will be adopted after the summer recess and will come into force in Q3/Q4 of 2012.  

Q&As Published on FSA's Transition to the FCA

On July 31, the FSA published a set of questions and answers on the transition to the new Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”).  Q&As

The Q&As confirmed that:

  • Firms will not need to reapply for authorisation under the new regime.
  • There were be a six month transition period following confirmation of the new disclosure wording concerning firms' regulatory status.
  • There will be little change to existing financial crime oversight and the approach to allocating fees.
  • The FCA will retain the FSA's online notifications and applications and online regulatory reporting systems.

The FSA plans to publish an FCA approach document in October.

 

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.