Owners' Request For Records - the Lahrkamp Saga Continues

more+
less-

Another follow-up to our previous posts on “Owners Requests for Records”.  As we previously posted, the Court agreed to vary its original order that the Corporation provide access to Mr.Lahrkamp to proxies and ballots by permitting the Corporation to redact references to owners and unit numbers. Mr. Lahrkamp appealed the variation and sought to reinstate the original order. 

The Superior Court of Justice Divisional Court determined that the Small Claims Court did have the jurisdiction to clarify and vary the original order. There was no basis for the appeal of the clarification order, as this was just a procedural matter  to clarify the original order, which was not appealed. 

This case once again confirms that an owner’s right to view records of the Corporation must be balanced with the privacy rights of other owners.

 

Topics:  Ballots, Condominiums, Owners Request for Records, Proxies

Published In: Business Organization Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Privacy Updates, Residential Real Estate Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Aird & Berlis | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »