The April 2010 edition of Patent Happenings,® written by the author of the Annotated Patent Digest, presents concise summaries of important developments in U.S. patent law occurring during the months of January through March 2010. Developments include:
1) Post Seagate cases show that the failure to obtain an opinion of counsel still weighs heavily in determining whether to enhance damages;
2) Using royalty rates in licenses given to settle infringement actions as evidence of a royalty rate in a hypothetical negotiation;
3) Accused infringer’s failure to challenge scope of a permanent injunction when appealing a final judgment precluded later challenge to the injunction’s scope when defending against a charge of contempt;
4) Federal Circuit overrules PTO’s methodology of calculating patent term adjustments where Period A delays “overlap” Period B delays.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Intellectual Property Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Robert Matthews, Jr., Matthews Patent-Law Consulting | Attorney Advertising