The January 2009 newsletter presents concise summaries of important developments in U.S. patent law occurring during the month of December, 2008. Developments include:
1) Federal Circuit grants mandamus reversing a denial of a motion to transfer by E.D. Texas;
2) Unresolved preliminary injunction motion prohibits staying case pending reexamination; stay requires continued existence of a “substantial question of patentability”;
3) Patentee’s selling a product in a forum does not support specific personal jurisdiction for an accused infringer’s declaratory judgment claim;
4) Patents held unenforceable for patentee’s deliberate failure to disclose patents to standard setting organization;
5) Adding a separate and distinct noninfringing feature does not avoid contributory infringement liability;
6) Granting licenses did not defeat permanent injunction;
7) Waiver found where intervening change in law arose before entry of final judgment;
8) Federal Circuit claim construction rulings;
9) Federal Circuit applies Bilski in biotech case;
10) Grouping claims requires a common limitation;
11) Patent-law expert could not testify on infringement or invalidity;
12) District court requires parties to show need for claim construction on a term-by-term basis;
13) Claim that licensee’s product was “covered by” a foreign patent could be heard in a U.S. court;
14) Ownership of an “essential” patent showed market power for antitrust claim; and
15) Western District of Washington and District of Massachusetts adopt local patent rules.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.