Newsletter presents concise summaries of important developments in U.S. patent law occurring during the month of November, 2008. Developments include:
1.) Nonpatent Supreme Court case may cast further doubt on applying a presumption of irreparable harm for preliminary injunctions in patent matters;
2.) Federal Circuit will not consider Appointment Clause challenges if not first presented to PTO;
3.) Summary judgment of obviousness vacated due to fact issue on whether asserted prior art was part of the field of invention a PHOSITA would search and whether the art taught away from using the asserted prior art;
4.) Accused infringer may recoup royalties paid to a patentee under a sunset provision in an injunction if the injunction is later ruled to have been wrongfully issued;
5.) Issue preclusion precluded patentee litigating entitlement to lost profits even though different patents were at issue;
6.) Accused infringer could not split/sever asserted patent claims into a second suit so that it could seek attorneys fees only as to the severed claims;
7.) Parties agreeing to a royalty and escrow payment plan before accused infringer filed a declaratory judgment action negated a right to a jury trial for the declaratory judgment claims;
8.) FTC to hold hearings on emerging business models of intellectual property ownership and how the current remedies law impacts those models; and
9.) PTO to charge registered attorneys and agents an annual fee to practice before the agency.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.