Patton Boggs Insights - January 2012 - Litigation/Courts: Appeal Of Attorney Fee Denial In Overturning Violation

more+
less-

A custodial firm doing business at a mine incurred some $22,000 in legal expenses fighting an order MSHA issued, then vacated. A judge ruled the company is not entitled to compensation under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA).

Since 1987, site-specific hazard awareness training had sufficed to allow employees of USA Cleaning Service and Building Maintenance to perform custodial services for the break rooms, bathrooms, offices and locker rooms at an Indiana mining operation. But, in February 2011, an MSHA inspector determined three janitors required new miner training instead, and threw them off the property until they got it. The company challenged the withdrawal order, and 10 days after MSHA issued it, the agency vacated it.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Energy & Utilities Updates, Labor & Employment Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Squire Patton Boggs | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »