Piercing the Corporate Veil – the Supreme Court Rules Again

more+
less-

In Prest v. Petrodel Resources Ltd the Supreme Court confirmed that the separate legal personality of a company cannot be disregarded unless the company is being abused for a purpose that is in some relevant respect improper. Specifically, the Court concluded that the separate legal personality of a company should only be disregarded where “a person is under an existing legal obligation or liability or subject to an existing legal restriction which he deliberately evades or whose enforcement he deliberately frustrates by interposing a company under his control.”

Background -

This decision arose out of proceedings for ancillary relief under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (the 1973 Act), brought by Mrs. Prest following her divorce from Mr. Prest. The dispute concerned the position of a number of companies (the Companies) belonging to a group found to be wholly owned and controlled by Mr. Prest. The Companies were joined as additional respondents to Mrs. Prest’s application for ancillary relief.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Corporate Veil, Divorce, Personal Liability, SCOTUS, UK

Published In: Business Torts Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »