Piercing the Corporate Veil…9 Ways to Avoid it.


Piercing the corporate veil “allows a plaintiff to impose legal liability for a corporation’s obligations, or for torts committed by the corporation, upon some other company or individual that controls and dominates the corporation.”  Cherry, 162 N.C. App. 535 (2004)

Piercing the Corporate Veil (“PCV”) is an equitable principle designed to place the burden of loss upon the party who should be responsible.  Glenn, 313 N.C. 450 (1985).  However, North Carolina courts have recognized that PCV should be applied reluctantly and cautiously.  Dorton, 77 N.C. App. 667 (1985).

In order for PCV to apply the following 3 elements must be satisfied:

(1)  Control, not mere majority or complete stock control, but complete domination, not only of finances, but of policy and business practice in respect to the transaction attacked so that the corporate entity has no separate mind, will or existence of its own;

(2) The control is used by the defendant to commit fraud or wrong, to perpetrate the violation of a statutory or other positive legal duty, or a dishonest and unjust act in contravention of plaintiff’s legal rights; and

(3) The control and breach of duty is the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury or unjust loss.

North Carolina courts have set forth a list of factors to consider in determining whether or not to PCV:

(1) inadequate capitalization

(2) non-compliance with corporate formalities

(3) complete domination and control of the corporation so that it has no independent identity

(4) excessive fragmentation of a single enterprise

(5) non-payment of dividends

(6) insolvency of the debtor corporation

(7) siphoning of funds by the dominant shareholder

(8) nonfunctioning of other officers or directions

(9) absence of corporate records

No one factor is determinative, but the first 4 are the most commonly relied upon ”primary factors.”  It is a combination of factors which suggest that the corporate entity has ”no separate mind, will or existence of its own” and was therefore a “mere instrumentality or tool.”  Glenn, 313 N.C. 450 (1985).  

The 9 ways to avoid PCV?  Pay close attention to these 9 factors and do the opposite.  And if you need incentive then see Estate of Hurst v. Morehead I et al, a very recent NC Court of Appeals case upholding a $4.9 Million verdict and imposing personal liability of a member of an LLC under PCV.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cranfill Sumner & Hartzog LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.