Robinson v. Azer

Plaintiff's Closing Argument in Jury Trial for Orthopedic Surgery Malpractice

Patrick Malone & Associates P.C. | DC Injury Lawyers
Contact

An 82-year-old patient who underwent a total knee replacement surgery ended up with a black leg that had to be amputated above the knee. This is plaintiffs' closing argument in a two-week jury trial alleging medical malpractice against the orthopedic surgeon who performed the knee replacement. The jury assessed damages totaling $8.35 million for the patient and his wife.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info: State, D.C. Circuit, D.C. | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Patrick Malone & Associates P.C. | DC Injury Lawyers

Written by:

Patrick Malone & Associates P.C. | DC Injury Lawyers
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Patrick Malone & Associates P.C. | DC Injury Lawyers on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide