The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed a class-action lawsuit against AT&T on January 31, 2006, accusing the telecom giant of violating the law and the privacy of its customers by collaborating with the National Security Agency (NSA) in its massive, illegal program to wiretap and data-mine Americans' communications.
Where the Case Stands Now: Telecom Immunity: In June of 2008, at the insistence of President Bush, Congress passed the FISA Amendments Act (FAA). In addition to broadly expanding the president's spying powers, the bill essentially granted immunity to telecoms alleged to have participated in the warrantless wiretapping program ? a clear attempt to shield the president's illegal spying program from examination in a court of law.
EFF believes the FAA is unconstitutional, and we are fighting back on multiple fronts. We are urging Congress to repeal the FAA in the next session, asking the courts to reject the immunity provisions as unconstitutional, and developing a new case against the government.
This is Plaintiffs' Evidentiary Objection to Certifications (Public and Ex Parte In Camera) by the Attorney General of the U.S.; and to the Motion to Dismiss or, In the Alternative, For Summary Judgment.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In: Communications & Media Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Privacy Updates
Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motion Addressed to Pleadings | Federal, 9th Circuit, California | United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Electronic Frontier Foundation | Attorney Advertising