In re Supportsoft, Inc. Securities Litigation

Plaintiffs' Letter Brief in Support of Motion to Compel Discovery Responses

more+
less-

This case covers all purchasers of the securities of SupportSoft, Inc. (“SupportSoft”) during the period from January 20, 2004 through October 1, 2004.

Schatz Nobel Izard, P.C. was appointed as Co-Lead Counsel by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on March 22, 2005. An Amended Complaint, filed on August 23, 2005, alleges that Defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing false or misleading public statements regarding Supportsoft’s sales and business model and the changing nature of its contracts with customers. By an order entered on June 1, 2006, the Court certified the action to proceed as a class action.

This is Plaintiffs' letter brief, with attached discovery requests, in support of Plaintiffs' motion to overrule defendants' objections to discovery and require responses.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Securities Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Discovery Motions | Federal, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Izard Nobel LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »