Crockford v. Spencer, et al

Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Partial Motion for Summary Judgment


This Memorandum of Law was filed in opposition to the defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in a trucking accident case. The defendants sought summary judgment as to our claims of recklessness. The case involved a rear-end collision; defendants' tractor-trailer collided with the plaintiff's stopped vehicle, a VW Beetle. As a result of the collision, the plaintiff suffered a serious brain injury. The defendants admitted negligence but denied recklessness. The case was tried before a jury, resulting in a verdict of $2,523,500.00.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | State, 2nd Circuit, Connecticut | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Scott Camassar, The Law Firm of Stephen M. Reck | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.