Crockford v. Spencer, et al

Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Partial Motion for Summary Judgment


This Memorandum of Law was filed in opposition to the defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in a trucking accident case. The defendants sought summary judgment as to our claims of recklessness. The case involved a rear-end collision; defendants' tractor-trailer collided with the plaintiff's stopped vehicle, a VW Beetle. As a result of the collision, the plaintiff suffered a serious brain injury. The defendants admitted negligence but denied recklessness. The case was tried before a jury, resulting in a verdict of $2,523,500.00.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | State, 2nd Circuit, Connecticut | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Scott Camassar, The Law Firm of Stephen M. Reck & Scott D. Camassar | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


The Law Firm of Stephen M. Reck & Scott D. Camassar on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.