This case arose from a challenge, a Post-Award Procurement Protest, to the selection of a successor food service Contractor for Army Morale, Welfare and Recreation (MWR) programs at Fort Campbell and at Fort Knox. MWR programs are typically funded out of patron revenues, not appropriated funds. Except in very limited circumstances, the Federal Courts do not have jurisdiction over Claims arising out of activities conducted with nonapproriated funds. This memorandum argues for Federal jurisdiction.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In:
Administrative Law Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Military Law Updates
Reference Info:
Legal Memoranda: Pre-Trial Motions |
Federal, Federal Circuit, Claims Court |
United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Cyrus E. Phillips IV, Albo & Oblon, L.L.P. | Attorney Advertising
