Plaintiff filed its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment seeking a determination that the insurer owed a duty to defend a case filed by a former employee who claimed that she was misclassified as exempt and that her emails had been improperly accessed and deleted by her employer. The dual theory on which the MSJ is based is that the EPLI policy covers both "privacy" violations and "misstatements" made to employees, and that the asserted exclusions (including those under the Fair Labor Standards Act) do not apply.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In: Insurance Updates, Labor & Employment Updates, Privacy Updates
Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | Federal, 9th Circuit, California | United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Robert Scott Lawrence, Callahan & Blaine | Attorney Advertising