Gauntlett v. Illinois Union Insurance Company

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Duty to Defend


Plaintiff filed its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment seeking a determination that the insurer owed a duty to defend a case filed by a former employee who claimed that she was misclassified as exempt and that her emails had been improperly accessed and deleted by her employer. The dual theory on which the MSJ is based is that the EPLI policy covers both "privacy" violations and "misstatements" made to employees, and that the asserted exclusions (including those under the Fair Labor Standards Act) do not apply.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | Federal, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robert Scott Lawrence, Callahan & Blaine | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Callahan & Blaine on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.