LeFlore v. Washington Hospital Center Corporation, Inc.

Plaintiff's Opposition To Defendant's Motion for Protective Order

This is an opposition brief to a medical malpractice defendant’s motion asking the court to allow defense counsel to hold ex parte meetings with subsequent treating physicians of the plaintiff, under the HIPAA statute. This is a favorite defense tactic in recruiting the plaintiff’s own physicians to serve as expert witnesses against the plaintiff’s case. In the opposition brief, we show that the defense argument that these ex parte meetings serve only to “level the playing field” does not hold water, and we discuss physician ethical requirements which argue against encouraging doctors to hold such meetings with their patients’ adversaries.

Please see full brief below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Conflict of Laws Updates, Professional Malpractice Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Discovery Motions | State, D.C. Circuit, D.C. | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Patrick Malone & Associates P.C. | DC Injury Lawyers | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »