This was a civil rights case where a photographer who was detained for photographing power lines near a power-station brought claims based on her detention and arrest. Defendants moved for summary judgment on the issue of municipal liability. The court denied the motion based on the existence of a factual dispute as to a pattern or practice. I handled the case as a cooperating attorney for the ACLU of Washington.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In:
Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Rights Updates, Communications & Media Law Updates
Reference Info:
Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication |
Federal, 9th Circuit, Washington |
United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Venkat Balasubramani, Focal PLLC | Attorney Advertising
