This article takes a comparative look at how the world's two largest economies are diverging in their approaches to regulating hazardous products and packaging, with major ramifications for manufacturing, waste management and trade. The European Union is implementing product oriented environmental regulation based on the principle of Extended Producer Responsiblity (EPR), which assigns responsibility to manufacturers to take back their products after consumers discard them. In theory, EPR could dramatically alter production practices by internalizing product externalities and providing incentives for environmentally friendly design. However, practical problems of implementing raise questions about the effectiveness of EPR as a policy tool.
This article examines the European experience with EPR, the reasons for apparent resistance to EPR in the United States, and the implications of a move toward product-oriented environmental law. It concludes that the transaction costs of EPR may outweight its environmental benefits and that EPR may not provide the expected design incentives. It therefore recommends that the United States consider alternative policy instruments to address environmental externalities from products.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Environmental Law Updates, International Law & Trade Updates, Toxic Torts Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Noah Sachs, University of Richmond School of Law | Attorney Advertising