Policyholder Obligations After an Insured Event: Are Baltic Insurance Laws Too Insurer-Friendly Compared to the Principles of European Insurance Contract Law?

more+
less-

http://versita.metapress.com/content/v07q02jg4534222l/fulltext.pdf

This article explores the differences between the Estonian Law of Obligations Act, the

Latvian Insurance Contract Law and Lithuanian rules contained in the Civil Code and

Insurance Law in comparison with the Principles of European Insurance Contract Law with regards to the policyholder’s obligations after insured event. The three key obligations after insured event, i.e., (i) the obligation to reduce damage, (ii) the obligation to report an insured event, and (iii) the obligation to cooperate, play a major role in the performance obligation of the insurer. It is precisely the proper performance of those obligations that determines how quickly the policyholder receives insurance indemnity, should there be an insured event. Breach of those obligations may in certain cases result in a refusal to pay insurance indemnity. Compared with national laws of the Baltic States, the relevant regulation provided in the PEICL is more favourable and consumer-friendly for policyholders.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Insurance Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Olavi-Juri Luik | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »