Pre-Purchase Exposure: Defeating Class Certification In False Advertising Cases


Originally published in the Daily Journal, December 13, 2011.

How can defendants in California defeat class certification in class actions that allege false advertising under either the "fraudulent" prong of the unfair-compensation law or the Consumer Legal Remedies Act? There is at least one good way to do so, and that is by demonstrating variability of consumer exposure to the challenged advertising claim.

While there is a difference between the two statutes, both require the plaintiff to prove that the challenged advertising claim was likely to deceive consumers, and that the plaintiff actually relied on the truth of the claim in deciding to purchase the product.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Antitrust & Trade Regulation Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Communications & Media Updates, Consumer Protection Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Venable LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »