Predecessor Attorney Not Liable for Breach of Fiduciary Duty Following Adverse Trial Outcome

more+
less-

In an unpublished decision, Robins v. Kuhn et., the California Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three) affirmed summary judgment for defendant attorneys, dismissing a former client’s suit for breach of fiduciary duty. In the underlying action, the plaintiff and his two brothers had sued a theater owner for wrongful death, Unruh Civil Rights Act violations, and violations of the Public Accommodations Act relating to their father’s fall at the theatre and subsequent death.

Two of the three brothers settled all wrongful death and survival claims with the theater, but plaintiff brother continued his suit against the theater in his individual capacity, substituting new counsel for mandatory settlement conferences and trial. At trial, the jury rendered a defense verdict and awarded statutory fees and costs against plaintiff for over $250,000. Plaintiff then sued his former attorneys for breach of fiduciary duty, alleging they failed to investigate his case sufficiently and warn him of the possibility that he could be responsible for the theater’s attorney fees and costs if he lost.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, Personal Injury Updates, Professional Malpractice Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sedgwick LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »