President Obama Issues Sequestration Order, CMS Has Yet to Publish Implementation Instructions


On March 1, 2013, President Obama issued a sequestration order directing the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to administer across-the-board cuts to federal spending.  Concurrently, OMB issued a report to Congress providing few details about the mechanics of sequestration.  CMS also has not yet announced how it will administer the two-percent cut to Medicare payments to hospitals, physicians and Medicare Advantage plans.  (Medicaid provider payments are exempt.)  Due to a provision in the 1980s-era sequestration statute, cuts to Medicare provider payments are not likely to begin until April 1, 2013 – the first day of the first full month after the president’s sequestration order.  And while CMS has not issued instructions, we believe that the two-percent cut will be applied to each claim with a date of service beginning on or after April 1, and not to older claims paid on or after April 1.  If CMS follows its procedures from the 1980s, the cuts will be applied only to the Medicare payment amount (i.e., the net DRG amount after deducting all beneficiary copayments, deductibles and secondary payor amounts). 

In addition to the two-percent payment cut to claims, CMS and HHS program budgets will face cuts of between 5 and 8 percent.  For example, the OMB report estimates that CMS’s budget for demonstration projects will fall by $27 million for FY 2013, and grants for Affordable Care Act insurance exchanges will incur a cut of $44 million.  Neither OMB nor CMS has specifically detailed how these cuts will be administered, or to what extent Medicare administrative contractor budgets and claims processing times will be affected.

The OMB report does not list the account from which Medicare EHR Incentive payments are made as subject to sequestration.  In September, OMB had listed that specific account as exempt from sequestration because it is part of an “intragovernmental” payment.  The dollars used to make EHR incentive payments originate in a different account, and are transferred into a receiving account that distributes incentive payments to providers.  OMB has said that such “funds are generally exempt in the receiving account . . . so the same dollars are not sequestered twice.”  The OMB report does not identify the account from which incentive payments originate and if that paying account — and thus, potentially, the incentive payments themselves — are subject to sequestration.

King & Spalding is closely monitoring these developments and will publish updates as they become available.  The OMB report is available by clicking here.

Reporter, Christopher Kenny, Washington, D.C., +1 202 626 9253,

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.