Jiovon Anonymous v. City of Rochester

Prevailing plaintiffs post-argument memorandum of law on their status as "prevailing parties" in support of their application for civil rights attorneys fees pursuant to 42 USC 1983 and 1988


Attorney's fee application in a civil rights case. Plaintiffs prevailed in overturning an unconstitutional youth curfew law enacted by the City of Rochester, New York. This memo of law addresses mootness and the requirement that before he may be considered a "prevailing party" under the civil rights attorney's fee statute (42 USC 1983 & 1988), a civil rights plaintiff must succeed in materially altering the legal relationship between himself and the government in a way that actually impacts the plaintiff. See Rhodes v. Stewart, 488 U.S. 1 (1988).

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

Reference Info:State, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Michael Burger, Santiago Burger LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.