Private E-Mail and Public Officials: What's a Public Document?

by Ballard Spahr LLP
Contact

The "Bridgegate" scandal in New Jersey involving an investigation into the George Washington Bridge lane closures has included many instances of Governor Chris Christie's top officials utilizing their own Gmail, Yahoo, or other personal accounts to conduct official business. For public officials, governmental agencies, and those seeking information from those entities under public records laws, the digital age has complicated the definition of what is considered to be a public document.

Public records laws govern how public officials’ documents and correspondence should be stored and released. These laws can vary widely from state to state, and many were drafted before e-mail and other digital communication became commonplace. Such laws are intended to promote openness and transparency in government at all levels. Many state and federal government officials, however, have raised questions about whether e-mail messages from their personal accounts should be deemed public records.

But is this a correct application? Are the private e-mails of public officials and agencies truly public documents? Are the personal e-mails of government officials subject to state and federal public records laws? Does it matter if a private e-mail address is used? The answer can depend on the state where you live, the content of the messages, court rulings, and how the applicable public records law is written.

FOIA at the Federal Level

The federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requires every executive federal agency to make available any agency record for public inspection. Records are broadly defined by statute and regulation to include all recorded information, regardless of medium or format, made or received by the agency or its agents under federal law relating to the transaction of public business, and either preserved or appropriate for preservation because of their administrative, legal, fiscal, or informational value. The federal statute does not, on its face, address the use of private e-mail accounts to conduct official business, and whether such an e-mail would be considered a public record. 

State Public Records Laws

All 50 states also have public records laws that allow members of the public to obtain documents and other public records from state and local government bodies. State public records laws are not identical to FOIA, nor are state court interpretations of similar language in state statutes necessarily the same as federal court interpretation of FOIA (though many were modeled upon FOIA). Only a handful of state FOIA statutes, including New Jersey, Delaware, and Colorado, even directly address whether a public official's e-mails are considered public records. Like the federal statute, these state laws also do not specifically address the use of private e-mail accounts to conduct official business.

For example, under Delaware's FOIA law, "e-mails received or sent by members of the Delaware General Assembly or their staff" are specifically exempted from the definition of a "public record." Colorado law classifies e-mail messages sent to or received by legislators as public records but exempts communications that "a constituent would have reason to expect to remain confidential." In other states, including Florida and Alaska, a message’s content—regardless of format or physical characteristics—determines if it is a public record. For example, under Florida's Public Record Act, a "public record" means all "documents… regardless of the physical form, characteristics, or means of transmission, made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business by any agency." Again, the statute does not address the use of private e-mail accounts versus official e-mail accounts.

Judicial Interpretation

Given the lack of statutory guidance, courts and state attorneys general have been left to decide two issues concerning the private e-mail accounts of public officials. First, whether a public official's e-mails sent and received on his or her private account are public records when they relate to public business, and if so, does the public have the right to access them? Across the country, where the issue has been addressed, decisions have generally boiled down to this: content is key. What ultimately determines whether a communication is a public record is its content, not the means of transmission.

In Alaska, former Governor Sarah Palin regularly used her Yahoo e-mail account to conduct state business. Ruling on a citizen activist's lawsuit, the Alaska Supreme Court in October 2012 held that state employees cannot use private e-mail accounts to shield their work communications from public record laws. The court held that while state employees could use private e-mails, private e-mails about state business should be part of the public record. In March 2013, a Superior Court judge in San Jose, California, ruled that private devices used to conduct government business can be subject to public disclosure laws. This includes text messages from private phones, e-mails from private accounts, and other electronic communications. Even in so-called "reverse" lawsuits, courts have reinforced the content-focused inquiry concerning private e-mail accounts.

In January 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that personal e-mails sent by teachers on a school district's computer system were not public records subject to disclosure under the state's FOIA because the "statute was not intended to render all personal emails public records. . . ." And in Illinois, the Attorney General issued an opinion in 2011 concluding that electronic records relating to the transaction of public business are “public records” subject to disclosure under the Illinois FOIA, even if they are generated on a public official’s personal electronic device or e-mail account.

At the federal level, a content-based inquiry has also been used. In September 2013, regarding certain officials in President Obama’s administration who were accused of using private e-mails to circumvent the federal FOIA, the National Archives said that multiple official e-mail accounts and the use of personal accounts were permissible in some situations, but that all official correspondence must be properly captured for record-keeping.

As courts begin to consider the impact of the use of private e-mails to conduct official business, the implications on the e-mails of public officials, public agencies, and those that seek those communications are significant. Based on judicial authority to date, the mere use of a private e-mail account will no longer provide complete immunity to disclosure under state and federal FOIA statutes. Similarly, the mere fact that an e-mail message is received on a government computer through a government e-mail address issued to a public official to conduct public business does not itself make the e-mail message a public record.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ballard Spahr LLP
Contact
more
less

Ballard Spahr LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.