Matthew Passen discusses the increased use of medical society "peer review" authority to discipline what the medical societies deem to be unethical or improper medical expert testimony in medical malpractice cases. Mr. Passen addresses the question whether victims of witness intimidation or improper medical peer review abuse have a viable cause of action against the medical societies.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In: Personal Injury Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Professional Malpractice Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Rights Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Matthew Passen, Passen Law Group | Attorney Advertising
JD Supra gets your content noticed, increases your visibility and makes your marketing efforts hassle free...
Learn More or Schedule a demo
