Put Up Your Dukes: Supreme Court Hands Advertisers New Weapons to Fight Spurious Class Actions


Employers are heralding the U.S. Supreme Court's decision this week in Wal Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U.S. __, No. 10-277 (June 20, 2011), which decertified a class of 1.5 million current and former Wal-Mart employees. Although the Dukes plaintiffs alleged gender discrimination, the Court's ruling will have broad impact, and advertisers should take note.

The Dukes decision offers advertisers new ammunition to oppose class certification in false advertising class actions. Here are three especially important aspects of the ruling to note:

• Common questions of fact and law do not justify a class action, unless those questions have common answers for all putative class members.

The Supreme Court recognized that with clever lawyering, almost any class action complaint can raise "common questions" of fact and law. Thus the existence of common questions, according to the Court, will not justify class certification. Rather, a class is appropriate only if the answers to those questions are common to all class members....

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Civil Rights Updates, Communications & Media Updates, Labor & Employment Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »