Race Tires America: District Court Identifies Another Tool to Shift E-Discovery Costs


Key Points:

A prevailing party may be able to recover at least some of its e-discovery costs at the conclusion of a case.

Costs arising from “highly technical” e-discovery tasks not able to be performed by attorneys or paralegals are more likely to be recoverable.

Recovery also more likely for e-discovery costs shown to be a direct result of discovery requests or of negotiated or court-ordered procedures.

Whether e-discovery costs relating to processing paper documents and electronic documents are recoverable varies by jurisdiction.

Any recovery requires sufficient documentation of what e-discovery tasks were performed and demonstration of the purpose of those tasks.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dechert LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Dechert LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.