Raising Expert Testimony Standards

We previously reported on Sargon Enterprises v. Univ. of Southern California (November 26, 2012) in which the California Supreme Court made clear that expert testimony regarding lost profits may not succeed if it is too speculative in nature.

An important part of the Sargon decision was the Court’s conclusion that “the trial court has a duty to act as a ‘gatekeeper’ to exclude speculative expert testimony.”

As one commentator recently noted, Sargon raises the issue of whether California Superior Courts must now follow stricter guidelines before admitting expert testimony, specifically guidelines similar to those used in Federal Courts. (Daubert: Coming to a Court Near You?, Daily Journal).

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Peter S. Bauman - Senior Commercial Litigation Attorney Callahan & Blaine, (714) 241-4444 (office) / (949) 842-1720 (mobile) | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

(714) 241-4444 (office) / (949) 842-1720 (mobile) on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×