Random Alcohol Testing Case Headed for Supreme Court

more+
less-

[author: ]

The Supreme Court of Canada will decide whether an employer must have “reasonable cause” to conduct random alcohol testing on unionized employees, or whether an inherently dangerous workplace is sufficient to justify random alcohol testing.

In the case, a unionized Irving Pulp and Paper employee, who occupied a safety sensitive position, was randomly tested for alcohol using a breathalyser. The test revealed a blood alcohol level of zero. Nevertheless, the union filed a policy grievance challenging the provision of the policy that permitted random alcohol testing “without cause”.

The New Brunswick Court of Appeal decided that Irving’s kraft paper mill was an inherently dangerous workplace, and that Irving did not have to prove that there was an existing alcohol problem in the workplace in order to conduct random alcohol testing.

The union has appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada. The SCC’s decision will be of interest to employers across Canada.

The New Brunswick Court of Appeal’s decision may be accessed at: http://canlii.ca/en/nb/nbca/doc/2011/2011nbca58/2011nbca58.html

 

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Labor & Employment Updates, Privacy Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dentons | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »