Reasonable Efforts May Be A Promisor’s Best Efforts


Contracts often include clauses requiring the parties to exercise their “best efforts” but don’t say what exactly this means.  For example, a merger agreement may require parties to use their best efforts to secure all necessary regulatory approvals.

Does a “best efforts” clause require a party to subordinate its interests to the other party or undertake extraordinary efforts to fulfill its obligations? Does a “best efforts” clause establish a fiduciary relationship between the parties? Is a “best efforts” requirement the same as good faith?

In an opinion certified for partial publication last week, the Third District Court of Appeal answered all of these questions.  California Pines Property Owners Ass’n v. Pedotti, Cal. Ct. Appeal Case No. C066315 (May 24, 2012) involved lawsuit over a rancher’s contractual obligation to use his “best efforts” to maintain a full reservoir.  The plaintiff contended that the “best efforts” clause imposed a fiduciary obligation on the rancher to place the plaintiff’s interest in having a full or mostly full reservoir above the rancher’s interests in watering his crops and stock.

In the published portion of the opinion, the Court of Appeal rejected the plaintiff’s contention; holding that when a contract does not define “best efforts”, the promisor “must use the diligence of a reasonable person under comparable circumstances”.  The Court’s opinion includes a number of observations about “best efforts” clauses and their enforcement that will undoubtedly be cited in future litigation, including:

  • “Best efforts are construed in the context of the circumstances of the particular case.”
  • “A best efforts clause must be reconciled with other clauses in the contract to the extent possible.”
  • “Best efforts does not mean every conceivable effort . . . .  It does not require the promisor to ignore its own interests, spend itself into bankruptcy, or incur substantial losses to perform its contractual obligations.”
  • “Diligence is certainly required, but the obligation is framed within the bounds of reasonableness.”
Finally, the court concluded that a promise to use “best efforts” is different than a promise to act in “good faith”:
Farnsworth [Farnsworth on Contracts] distinguishes the standard of best efforts from that of good faith: “Good faith is a standard that has honesty and fairness at its core and that is imposed on every party to a contract.  Best efforts is a standard that has diligence as its essence and is imposed on those contracting parties that have undertaken such performance.  The two standards are distinct and . . . best efforts is the more exacting . . . .”


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Allen Matkins on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.